{"id":2297,"date":"2017-10-27T22:12:18","date_gmt":"2017-10-28T05:12:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/?p=2297"},"modified":"2018-02-14T11:17:03","modified_gmt":"2018-02-14T19:17:03","slug":"digital-dependency-and-civil-society","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/?p=2297","title":{"rendered":"Digital dependency and civil society"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Our dependence on digital data and infrastructure expands both the options for\u00a0<\/span><\/em>civil action and the levers and forces by which it can be restricted. \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span>
\n<\/em>\u2013Lucy Bernholz<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"\"
Photo, Perpetual, Ltd.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u00a0\"\"<\/h3>\n

Preamble: A piece of the puzzle?<\/h3>\n

Back in February, I wrote of struggling to find my place in the political, economic, and social circumstances of our world today. What is my piece of the puzzle in building up a countervailing force? 1<\/sup> I\u2019m still sorting this out, and now I suspect there\u2019s not one but several pieces.<\/p>\n

One puzzle piece is informed by my work with Lucy Bernholz, director of Stanford\u2019s Digital Civil Society Lab and self-defined \u201cphilanthropy wonk.\u201d For the last nine years I\u2019ve been lucky enough to work with her as editor and sounding board for an annual monograph. Now based at Stanford\u2019s Center for Philanthropy and Civil Society and director of its Digital Civil Society Lab, Lucy has deep practical and theoretical knowledge of philanthropy, and many people in that world have long looked to her for insights into their work. Over the nine years I\u2019ve worked with her, her focus has expanded to encompass the whole of civil society and all the ways that, in her words, \u201cpeople and organizations voluntarily use private resources for public benefit.\u201d In this context, resources mean time, money, and expertise. She has also broadened the work to acknowledge and directly confront the fact that our civil society is highly dependent on today\u2019s digital infrastructure and digital data, a dependency that brings both promise and peril. This work and these interests led to founding the \u201cDigital Civil Society Lab.\u201d 2<\/sup><\/p>\n

The annual monograph that I get to work on is published at the end of each year and offers \u201cinsight,\u201d \u201cforesight,\u201d and \u201cglimpses of the future\u201d that are meant to help readers anticipate and navigate the next year. In January this year I posted excerpts from the previous Blueprint<\/em>. 3<\/sup> This year\u2019s edition will be published in mid-December \u00ad\u2014 Philanthropy and Digital Civil Society: Blueprint 2018<\/em>. At that point, you\u2019ll be able to find it either at the Digital Civil Society Lab or on her blog, Philanthropy2173. 4<\/sup>\u00a0 \u00a0I\u2019ll also post a link on this site. If you\u2019re eager to read a Blueprint<\/em> before then, you can check out all eight back issues here<\/a>. 5<\/sup><\/p>\n

I love the process of working with writing by people I admire in part because it gives me a privileged view into their thinking. This is especially invigorating when the process allows for dialogue around ideas that matter to me. Working with Lucy has reinforced, challenged, and expanded my thinking. What work could be better than that?<\/p>\n

Why might all this be a piece of the puzzle? Often a first step in changing something is better understanding what we\u2019re dealing with. Learning from Lucy and doing what I can to help her insights be clear is part of it for me. Another is not hanging on to what I learn but sharing it with friends and posting it here. What follows is based on a couple of ideas from the Blueprint<\/em> that\u2019s underway right now, mixed up, I\u2019m sure, with my own experience.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/h3>\n

The dynamism of small and fluid<\/h3>\n

\u201cWe are surrounded by big, fragile institutions,\u201d writes Lucy Bernholz referring to global companies, established political structures, and big nonprofits. This might seem to contradict what it feels like when we read the news and experience the impact of these large institutions on our daily lives. Lucy goes on, though, to point out that we can see their fragility in their mono-cultural, top-heavy, and increasingly rigid structures.<\/p>\n

She contrasts these big institutions with the many small, fluid, and networked alternatives that exist all around us. In her words I recognize the kinds of informal groups, small organizations, and loose networks that have been home for the communities I inhabit and the work I do. The dynamism of the world of small groups isn\u2019t changing, Lucy says, but she senses that their attitude toward big institutions is. The small have adopted a more challenging attitude toward the big and take a more confrontational stance than they did in the past.<\/p>\n

From her vantage point at the Digital Civil Society Lab, Lucy specifically calls out small, networked \u201ctech-driven alternatives to party politics, nonprofit or research-driven alternatives to corporate data monopolies, and crowdfunding of public services.\u201d These groups, she reports, have often been purchased, suppressed, and ignored by the big institutions. And they \u201cdon\u2019t see themselves as mere fleas on an elephant, rather they challenge themselves to be the termites that topple the house.\u201d<\/p>\n

A fluid array of these small, active alternatives function within civil society. In fact, along with many other groups and a set of behavioral norms, their participation constitutes<\/em> civil society. As Lucy puts it\u2026<\/p>\n

Civil society is where those without power or critical mass can build both and influence the majority. It serves as a conduit to the majority system and a counterbalance to extreme positions. It also serves as an outlet for those actions, rights, and views that may never be the priority of a majority, but that are still valid, just, or beautiful.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Civil society is distinct from but overlaps with both the commercial marketplace and government, and it\u2019s meant to be a place where we can come together to take action as private citizens for the public good.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Digital dependency<\/h3>\n

The Lab defines digital civil society as \u201call the ways people and organizations voluntarily use private resources for public benefit in a digital world<\/u>.\u201d It also refers to the space of digital civil society as \u201ccomplicated,\u201d and part of what complicates it is that most of digital space is owned or monitored by commercial firms and governments. For the most part, the designers of the tools we use and the rules that regulate our use of them are guided by corporate or governmental norms and not by the norms of civil society \u2013 not<\/em>, that is, by a commitment to the common good or to individual rights (of free expression, peaceable assembly, and privacy), and not to pluralism or tolerance.<\/p>\n

Much of the resurgence of political action and resistance among my various communities of friends functions in civil society\u2019s small, fluid, and networked groups, fostered in living rooms, in coffee shops, and on the streets. And it also relies heavily on digital communication and on information gathered from digital sources. These tools facilitate many aspects of our lives and increase the ways we can organize, share information, and reach people across the city and the world. However, our dependency on the digital infrastructure also means we\u2019re vulnerable to actions by both corporations and governments to narrow the space we have to operate in.<\/p>\n

In the upcoming monograph, Lucy writes:<\/p>\n

Our daily use of the most basic tools of the digital age such as cellular phones, email, or networked printers means that our activities are bounded by and reliant on the rules and tools of the companies that make the gadgets and wire the world. As we use these tools, our activities are also monitored by the governments that surveil the digital spaces in which our tools operate. Our actions in the space are shaped by the values of the companies that make the tools (even as the companies seek to deny it) and by the way we respond to being watched by both corporations and governments.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Lucy gives many examples of ways that governments and corporations can and have narrowed or closed the space for civil society, and her scope is global. Her information is based on direct observation and on engagement with people in countries around the world \u2013 that is, her examples don\u2019t just reflect what\u2019s happening here, in the United States. The restrictions she mentions may be familiar to many of us, but the list is long. A few include: Digital tools make it easier to monitor financial transactions and public assembly. Business models using digital systems can use social media to censor or confuse. Governments have a direct impact on nonprofit and civil society purposes by shifting funding and cutting off access to key data sets and sources. In some places, companies are allowed to charge different rates to different internet users. \u201cToxic company cultures, their seemingly unchecked power and influence over public policy, the manipulative power of their products, and their ability to be used as news sources are common news stories across the world, even in the polarized media of the U.S.\u201d And this is only the beginning of identifying the ways that the space for civil society and digital civil society is closing.<\/p>\n

Another challenge Lucy identifies is that \u201ccivil society advocates,\u201d many of us, for instance, \u201care largely isolated from digital rights expertise.\u201d Beyond this, much of the open source infrastructure that supports the tools used by civil society groups and individuals is sustained \u201cby the voluntary, episodic labor of a remarkably few people.\u201d The system is underfunded, she says, fragile and invisible. As I see it, most of the rules and tools of our digital dependency are invisible\u2026so invisible, in fact, that much of it has come to seem intuitive and natural.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/h3>\n

What to do?<\/h3>\n

My first impulse is to simply to share something of what I\u2019m learning and encourage you to read Lucy\u2019s next Blueprint<\/em> when it comes out. Working on both this edition and previous ones has made me more alert to choices I make when I\u2019m online and gives me new targets for my advocacy. So much of what we\u2019re organizing and fighting for is a fair and open civil society, a space for the small, sometimes confrontational, ever-changing groups that work for the common good and individual rights. So I take these words of Lucy\u2019s to heart:<\/p>\n

Efforts to maintain an open civil society now require a much deeper understanding of how dependent we are on digital data and infrastructure and how much the digital world changes civil society\u2019s relationships to state and corporate actors.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

I\u2019d like to be part of increasing that understanding. This issue of Blueprint<\/em> reinforces my awareness that digital technology is, as Lucy puts it, \u201cnot inherently democratizing.\u201d More of us have to become intentional about engaging with it. Gaining a better understanding of what we face also increases my awareness of just how hard it will be to change, especially since the impact of the way it works has become ubiquitous and invisible.<\/p>\n

Another of the many things I love about working with Lucy is that, with all she knows and all the perils she identifies, she still ends Blueprint 2018<\/em> this way:<\/p>\n

It\u2019s audacious to think that civil society, globally, can reboot and reframe itself. I think it must. And it can.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/h3>\n

Notes<\/h3>\n

1. \u00a0What\u2019s my piece of the puzzle? \u00a0http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/?p=1793
\n<\/a>2. \u00a0The Digital Civil Society Lab, https:\/\/pacscenter.stanford.edu\/digital-civil-society\/
\n<\/a>3. \u00a0\u201cWe must fight to protect democracy in a digital age, Lucy Bernholz,\u201d http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/?p=1681
\n<\/a>4. \u00a0Philanthropy 2173 \u00a0http:\/\/philanthropy.blogspot.com
\n<\/a>5. \u00a0Eight years of Blueprints \u00a0<\/em>https:\/\/pacscenter.stanford.edu\/blueprint\/<\/a><\/p>\n

The photograph of Lucy is from Perpetual, Limited, the Digital Civil Society Lab’s partner organization in Australia.<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Our dependence on digital data and infrastructure expands both the options for\u00a0civil action and the levers and forces by which it can be restricted. \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2013Lucy Bernholz \u00a0 Preamble: A piece of the puzzle? Back in February, I wrote of struggling to find my place in the political, economic, and social circumstances of our…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-after-the-2016-election","category-the-commons-civil-society"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7pXN0-B3","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2297"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2297\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2710,"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2297\/revisions\/2710"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}