His op ed told the forgotten story of the days in the 1800s when young people voted in droves and were the most engaged demographic in U.S. politics. They \u201cspeechified\u201d and rioted in wild elections from the 1830s to 1900. “Reading 16-year-olds\u2019 diaries,\u201d he said, \u201cyou can see the way they bundled political involvement with their latest romance, their search for work, and the acne on their foreheads. Public participation soothed private anxiety. Youth politics worked because it was so messy, blending ideology with identity, the fate of the country with \u2018fun and frolic\u2019.”<\/p>\n
He tells the story in his book,\u00a0The Virgin Voter: How Young Americans Made Democracy Social, Politics Personal, and Voting Popular in the Nineteenth Century<\/em>. “Millions of children, youths, and young adults forced their way into the life of their democracy,” he said, “while their democracy forced its way into their personal lives.” \u00a0What in the 20th century often felt like a weak link in our political system was once the strongest. “Young people did vote,\u201d Grinspan wrote. “They could do so again.\u201d<\/p>\n In our 2018 mid-term elections, young people began to prove Grinspan right. In April 2019, the Washington Post<\/em>, carried a story with this headline: “Young people actually rocked the vote in 2018, new Census Bureau data reports.” The news piece began, “Voter turnout spiked to a 100-year high in last year’s midterm congressional elections.\u2026turnout rates jumped across nearly all groups, but the shift was particularly notable among young adults.” The number of voters aged 18-29 jumped 16 percentage points since 2014. “Last year’s election marked a clear break from the past two decades of anemic turnout among the youngest citizens.”<\/p>\n Knowing that things have changed in the past assures me that they they can change again. Young voters proved that in 2018. What we see today doesn’t have to be what will be tomorrow.<\/p>\n Grinspan’s insight mirrors Rebecca Solnit’s words about hope. “Hope for me,” she has said, “is deeply tied to the fact that we don\u2019t know what will happen. This gives us grounds to act while being clear that terrible things are happening.\u2026 One of the great conundrums is that unless we believe there are possibilities we don\u2019t act, but the possibilities only exist if we seize them.\u2026 We\u2019re not talking about a future that\u2019s already written.”<\/p>\n The forgotten past and a future that’s unknown both open up possibilities. We just have to be convinced as we face today’s realities that new options are possible and that it’s up to us to imagine them and act on our commitment to make them happen.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Notes<\/b><\/p>\n Jon Grinspan’s column in\u00a0<\/span>New York Times<\/em>, \u201cVirgins, Booze, and Politics<\/a>,\u201d ran on April 10, 2016.<\/p>\n Scott Clement and Ted Mellnik, “Young people actually rocked the vote in 2018<\/a>, new Census Bureau data reports,” Washington Post<\/i>, April 23, 2019.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Seed-pod-Trotscher-644x427.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.annefocke.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/cropped-9099-Logo-red_D-nick-square-smaller.jpg\"){kind=logo}
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"